|
KMID : 1134820080370060729
|
|
Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
2008 Volume.37 No. 6 p.729 ~ p.737
|
|
|
Perception of School Foodservice Officials on Rice Bread as School Foodservice Menu
|
|
Yang Il-Sun
Lee Min-A
Cha Sung-Mi
Jo Yoon-Hee
Lee So-Young
Lee So-Jung
Lee Hae-Young
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
The purposes of this study were to investigate supporting status and subsidy for school food service and to analyze the perception of school food service officials at the educational board on using rice bread to the school food service menu. The questionnaire was developed by content analysis, situation analysis, in-depth interview and checked by the school food service officials at the educational board. The questionnaires were responded by 33 officials (respondent rate: 86.8%) during September 1 to October 26 in 2007. The major findings of this study were as follows: First, most of the respondents were women (93.9%), and worked an average of 104.36 months at school-related work. The metropolitan & provincial office of education had prevalently jurisdiction over 272.3 rural and self-operation type of elementary schools, 115.50 rural and self-operation type of middle schools and 73.0 rural and self-operation type of high schools. In the case of the district office of education, 23.3 urban and self-operation type of elementary schools, 11.6 urban and self-operation type of middle schools and 5.3 urban and contracted type of high schools were averagely managed. Second, all the respondents supported meal cost for low-income group and 50.5% provided reimbursement for organic environmental agricultural products. The highest subsidy was 16.8 billion won as meal cost for low-income group in metropolitan & provincial office and 1,050 million won as labor cost in district office. Third, the experience of performing policies for using rice was relatively lower than perception of rice bread application to school food service menu. Fourth, the advantages of using rice bread were acceleration of consuming rice (32.0%), excellence of nutrition (24.0%) and promotion of healthy image (22.7%). On the other hand, the difficulties of using rice bread were lack of facilities (72.7%), higher cost compared to wheat bread (54.5%), limitation of menu application and cooking method (15.7% each). Fifth, the opinion of utilizing rice and that of applying rice bread were significantly correlated (p＜0.001). Desirability and willingness were correlated with reality for applying rice bread to the school food service menu (p＜0.001). Also, comparative analysis between divided groups by perception of utilizing rice showed that willingness and experience were significantly different.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
rice bread, school foodservice, school foodservice officials, subsid, ymenu
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|